Re: A85: 16-bit integer Square Root (few changes)

• To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A85: 16-bit integer Square Root (few changes)
• From: Jarno Rajala <jarraj@opal.tnkpub.utu.fi>
• Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 13:11:22 +0200 (EET)
• Delivered-To: assembly-85-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.94.980317083719.19926A-100000@triton>
• Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org

On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Humberto Yeverino wrote:

> You must have misunderstood.  It took about .7 seconds for 256 worst cases
> to execute meaning the time to execute a worst case is .7/256= .002734
> seconds.

Oh! My mistake. Anyway the table thing I mentioned earlier should be alot
faster than mine or your routine, only that it takes 512 bytes of memory
for the table, but the table could be calculated at the start of the
program (Shouldn't take more that a few seconds). I probably won't have
the time to program it though...

• Re: A85: 16-bit integer Square Root (few changes)
• From: Humberto Yeverino <humberto@engr.csufresno.edu>

• Re: A85: 16-bit integer Square Root (few changes)
• From: Humberto Yeverino <humberto@engr.csufresno.edu>

• Prev: Re: A85: Writing text to graph memory
• Next: Re: A85: 16-bit integer Square Root (few changes)
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread