Re: A85: TI's numbering system

• To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A85: TI's numbering system
• From: Brian Leech <butvis@mindspring.com>
• Date: Sun, 15 Mar 1998 14:21:11 -0500
• Delivered-To: assembly-85-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• In-Reply-To: <19980314233509.18460.qmail@hotmail.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org

At 03:34 PM 3/14/98 PST, Robert Caldwell wrote:

>first came the 80 and 81
>then came the 82
>slightly after the 82 came the 85
>then came the assemblers
>ti-92 and 83
>ti-86 and 92-hack
>92+, 89, and 76

As previously discussed on this list, the order is 81, 85, 82, 80, 92, 83,
86, 92+, now followed by 89 and 76 (although I'm not sure which one of
those came first).

--
Brian Leech
butvis@mindspring.com
ICQ UIN: 1355611

• Re: A85: TI's numbering system
• From: nine1one@juno.com (Mike Young)

• A85: TI's numbering system
• From: "Robert Caldwell" <rc_ware@hotmail.com>

• Prev: A85: Getting "Programming the z80" by R. Zaks
• Next: Re: A85: TI's numbering system
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread