Re: A85: Q: TI-85 Questions

To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A85: Q: TI-85 Questions
From: kevin hart <har05237@acad.suffolk.edu>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 1998 13:58:49 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: assembly-85-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
In-Reply-To: <359C0B3F.22A7@unet.univie.ac.at>
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org



> If you are using the Graphlink to make the serial to TI protocol
> convertion, then you are limited to 9600( the TLC549 had serial
> output, not? ). If you use a microcontroller to do the conversion
> then you can go up to ~11Kpbs. In that case a PIC with
> built-in A/D converter is simpler (and cheap )to use,eg. the PIC12C671.

Hi Sami:
	Thanks for the reply. 9600 is ok. I don't have the tools to do
PIC, but I can do 68HC11. It has 4 A/D 's built in so I can do
multi-channel or I can use the Atmel AT90S1200. That has a built in A/D,
too, as well as EEPROM and is cheap! The eeprom could store the program
string to be sent to the TI. That makes it a one chip solution. In fact, I
think that is the best solution. I'm glad I asked. You have saved me a lot
of trouble, and I really appreciate that! Thanks Sami!

-Kev

Follow-Ups:

Re: A85: Q: TI-85 Questions

From: Adam Geitgey <csrawebtech@qualityservice.com>

References:

Re: A85: Q: TI-85 Questions

From: Sami Khawam <a9501901@unet.univie.ac.at>