Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.

To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.
From: BSharp81@aol.com
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 12:58:21 EDT
Delivered-To: assembly-85-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org


While I think that you ahve a valid point, I have my own thought on this
matter. I currently don't own an e2 for 2 reasons:
1. I don't quite have the money to get one
2. (Most importantly) what can I use all of that space for

If there is a OS that supports the e2 and uses more of it's space and
capabilities. I would definently buy it. I think other people might agree with
this and a lack of use for all of that mem could be holding them back. Not
many people had personal computers when they hit the market, but now they are
extremely possible. I believe that the e2 would increase in popularity if an
OS was created only for the e2 and used it capabilities and functions.

Greg Sharp



> My point is that only a very small percentage of TI-85 users have an e2,
>  so you wouldn't be saving much of the TI-85.

Prev: Re: A85: return of OS hardware
Next: Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread