Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.


My point is that only a very small percentage of TI-85 users have an e2,
so you wouldn't be saving much of the TI-85.

-- 
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/

On Fri, 14 Aug 1998, Kaus wrote:

> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org>
> Date: Friday, August 14, 1998 1:25 AM
> Subject: Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.
> 
> 
> >
> >The shell-developers mailing list was made for this type of thing.  Maybe
> >we should get rid of it if no one is going to use it?
> >
> >I don't mind if anyone wants to inform the A85 list about the new features
> >being planned or something like that, but the actual planning of the shell
> >should be made on SD.  When there is too much list traffic, users tend to
> >shy away because they don't want to read all that mail.
> >
> >Also, if you want to save the TI-85, why are you making a shell that
> >requires the e2?
> 
> Because the e2 is a way that lets the 85 be an awesome piece of hardware.
> You couldn't do what we plan to do on just the 85.  Although the side of the
> OS will be to save the 85, its also just so damn exhilerating to make such a
> revolutionary OS.
> Jonathan Kaus
> 
> 
> >
> >--
> >Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
> >   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
> >   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
> >
> >On Fri, 14 Aug 1998 CashOnly@aol.com wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > Assembly-85 is for discussion on programming assembly on the 85, not
> >> >  making shells or OS.  It is more for making games, programs, and
> general
> >> >  programming help.
> >> >
> >> >  OS, shell?  Same diff. :P
> >>
> >> Last time I checked it didn't really matter what we talked about. At
> least
> >> we're talking. The programmers of these games also need to know what is
> going
> >> on. If this was only on SD, then they might not be informed of what the
> new
> >> features will be. Or might not get a chance to say what they want in the
> >> shell. I think we are benifiting from this discussion. This project was
> also
> >> started (I believe) as a way to save the 85. If so it makes more sense to
> have
> >> it on the 85 list, not a list for all calcs. Just IMHO :)
> >>
> >> -------
> >> NAME : Mikel Blanchard, President of Macross Software
> >> WEB   : http://MacrossSoftware.home.ml.org/
> >> EMAIL : cashonly@aol.com
> >> ICQ     : 3033904 (CashOnly)
> >>
> >
>
References: