Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.
The shell-developers mailing list was made for this type of thing. Maybe
we should get rid of it if no one is going to use it?
I don't mind if anyone wants to inform the A85 list about the new features
being planned or something like that, but the actual planning of the shell
should be made on SD. When there is too much list traffic, users tend to
shy away because they don't want to read all that mail.
Also, if you want to save the TI-85, why are you making a shell that
requires the e2?
--
Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
On Fri, 14 Aug 1998 CashOnly@aol.com wrote:
>
> > Assembly-85 is for discussion on programming assembly on the 85, not
> > making shells or OS. It is more for making games, programs, and general
> > programming help.
> >
> > OS, shell? Same diff. :P
>
> Last time I checked it didn't really matter what we talked about. At least
> we're talking. The programmers of these games also need to know what is going
> on. If this was only on SD, then they might not be informed of what the new
> features will be. Or might not get a chance to say what they want in the
> shell. I think we are benifiting from this discussion. This project was also
> started (I believe) as a way to save the 85. If so it makes more sense to have
> it on the 85 list, not a list for all calcs. Just IMHO :)
>
> -------
> NAME : Mikel Blanchard, President of Macross Software
> WEB : http://MacrossSoftware.home.ml.org/
> EMAIL : cashonly@aol.com
> ICQ : 3033904 (CashOnly)
>
References: