Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.

To: <assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.
From: "Kaus" <kaus@cybrzn.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 23:33:19 -0500
Delivered-To: assembly-85-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org


Well, maybe not THAT elaborate, but yes.  We need our own file types. Our
own naming format.  Our own storage style.
Jonathan Kaus

-----Original Message-----
From: TGaArdvark@aol.com <TGaArdvark@aol.com>
To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Thursday, August 13, 1998 11:22 PM
Subject: Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.


>
>> But, something i want to bring up, we shouldnt use TI's variable format.
>> Why do we need variables? we are going to need FILES!!
>
>I thought about this. We could do something like the "32 bit FAT"
>and make an extended VAT with a directory structure and long
>filenames and different var types and such. If we wanted to.

Prev: A85: Re: General
Next: Re: Re: A85: Re: DHOS: PXGray's Statement.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread