Re: A85: Re: TI-H: DH85

To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A85: Re: TI-H: DH85
From: "Matt Butch" <mjb25@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 07:05:46 PDT
Delivered-To: assembly-85-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org


OK, but most of the good features will *most likely* be in that PlugIn.  
What would be the max size of a OS on that 85 that you would use?? We'll 
try to fit as many feature in that max size as possible


>Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 14:40:13 +0200 (MET DST)
>From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: Re: A85: Re: TI-H: DH85
>Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
>
>
>Why not make a shell that supports the e2 but doesn't require it.  Like
>make a "plug-in" to support the e2..
>
>-- 
>Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
>   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>
>On Thu, 13 Aug 1998, Matt Butch wrote:
>
>> 
>> Well I guess that only a small percentage will use this OS.  When 
this 
>> OS was first talked about, everybody agreed that it will be for the 
>> EII.(Which some people apperantly forget)  Maybe we will make a 
scaled 
>> down version.  But it will be primarily for the EII.
>> 
>> Since the block diagram was never posted, I'm going to make my own.
>> 
>> 
>> >Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 09:36:30 +0200 (MET DST)
>> >From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>> >To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
>> >Subject: Re: A85: Re: TI-H: DH85
>> >Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
>> >
>> >
>> >Well that would limit the user base of the shell to just those who 
own 
>> the
>> >e2, a fairly small percentage of TI users.
>> >
>> >-- 
>> >Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>> >   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
>> >   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>> >
>> >On Thu, 13 Aug 1998 BSharp81@aol.com wrote:
>> >
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> > Sorry, I just thought that some of the ideas were pretty bad.  
We 
>> are
>> >> writing
>> >> >  a shell for a device with 28k of storage space.  It would be 
>> pretty stupid 
>> >> > to
>> >> >  have a shell that takes more than 10% of that.  Everyone needs 
to 
>> keep in
>> >> >  mind, we are not writing a new OS and interface, just something 
to 
>> list
>> >> >  and execute programs.
>> >> 
>> >> I believe that the idea is to have the OS on the calc, but to have 
>> all of the
>> >> programs and extras on an e2. Am I right?
>> >> 
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________
>> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>> 
>
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com