Re: A85: Re: TI-H: DH85

To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A85: Re: TI-H: DH85
From: "Matt Butch" <mjb25@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 05:10:58 PDT
Delivered-To: assembly-85-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org


Well I guess that only a small percentage will use this OS.  When this 
OS was first talked about, everybody agreed that it will be for the 
EII.(Which some people apperantly forget)  Maybe we will make a scaled 
down version.  But it will be primarily for the EII.

Since the block diagram was never posted, I'm going to make my own.


>Date: Thu, 13 Aug 1998 09:36:30 +0200 (MET DST)
>From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: Re: A85: Re: TI-H: DH85
>Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
>
>
>Well that would limit the user base of the shell to just those who own 
the
>e2, a fairly small percentage of TI users.
>
>-- 
>Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>
>   File Archives, News, Features, HTML, and Support
>   the ticalc.org project - http://www.ticalc.org/
>
>On Thu, 13 Aug 1998 BSharp81@aol.com wrote:
>
>> 
>> 
>> > Sorry, I just thought that some of the ideas were pretty bad.  We 
are
>> writing
>> >  a shell for a device with 28k of storage space.  It would be 
pretty stupid 
>> > to
>> >  have a shell that takes more than 10% of that.  Everyone needs to 
keep in
>> >  mind, we are not writing a new OS and interface, just something to 
list
>> >  and execute programs.
>> 
>> I believe that the idea is to have the OS on the calc, but to have 
all of the
>> programs and extras on an e2. Am I right?
>> 
>
>


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Follow-Ups:

Re: A85: Re: TI-H: DH85

From: Bryan Rabeler <brabeler@ticalc.org>