Re: A85: Saving the 85

To: <assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: Re: A85: Saving the 85
From: "Steve Ranck" <psufreak@mindless.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 10:04:15 -0400
Delivered-To: assembly-85-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org


I think we could hack it to read and write during programs, but does the e2
die after so many writes like the ESF? This could drastically cut back on
the e2's life. I'll check into it.

-----Original Message-----
From: DorkReMi@aol.com <DorkReMi@aol.com>
To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org>
Date: Thursday, August 06, 1998 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: A85: Saving the 85


>
>Jeez.  So many ideas... but there may be a problem. Is it not the same
problem
>as it was with memory expander 1, in that it could not actively read/write
>during programs?  Or do I have a misconception?  Sheeze, a new driver for
the
>me2 will have to be written.  Is all of this feasible? REALLY?
>
>-Josh Morris
> dorkremi@aol.com
>