Re: A85: Shells and games
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A85: Shells and games
Andi was on a vacation and having server problems so he could not update
his page; it was therefore released directly to TICALC.org. I would assume
his server is "fixed" now, so he updated his page finally. Plus, since he
was more involved in making 1.1, he announced it on a85.
At 05:57 PM 9/12/97 -0400, you wrote:
>Pardon me all to bits for making a suggestion to everyone, I personally
>like Usgard but i never as the message announcing 1.0 and Andy's page was
>never updated until version 1.1 two days ago. i ask because I want so
>feed back from other people about the idea....If you just go and make a
>shell in you own ideals and you think it is the best one in the world
>that's fine but if everyone else hates it what good is it.
>
>*_*_*_*_*_*_ more stuff in the quotes from me *_*_*_*_*_*_*_*
>
>On Thu, 11 Sep 1997 19:02:04 -0500 Terry Peng <tpeng@geocities.com>
>writes:
>>Nicholas C Anderson wrote:
>>> >Excuse me, but the shell you describe as the "one last shell"
>>matches
>>> >Usgard quite much... it has two versions, LITE and STANDARD, it's
>>very
>>> >easy to use (the base version is - you can never remove all
>>> >complications
>>> >if you want different versions of something)
>>>
>>> Version 1.0 of Usgard??? if so I need to know where to find it...
>>Ess's
>>> page is not updated then, If so then great!!! Are libs still needed
>>for
>>> the simpler shells or has that been done away with??? If the
>>answers
>>> are true then START MAKING MORE GAMES FOR USGARD PLEASE
>>> it has been a long time since I have seen a release of a truely
>>awesome
>>> game for the 85 released from this list or announced to us (I love
>>to
>>> try out new games and programs so let the list know when you release
>>> something).
>>
>>Here's an original idea: make your OWN programs!
>
>Here's an original idea: read the message! (Understand that I don't have
>the skills yet to writte my own games also SEE THAT IS MESSAGE IS A
>SUGGESTION TO THE SHELL USERS AND PROGRAMMERS THE IDEA WAS TO GET FEED
>BACK NOT A BUNCH OF STUPID FLAMERS!!!
>
>>
>>>
>>> >I don't see how you can think Usgard is harder to use than ZShell
>>4.0...
>>>
>>> I am only talking about the complexities generated by the Libs and
>>the
>>> multi shells and popup windows...simple keystokes to change
>>contrast are
>>> better than that control panel (please don't go pissy on my if that
>>has
>>> been fixed in the newest Usgard version)
>>>
>>> >> I ask everyone who writes shells to work as a GROUP on
>>this
>>> please. I make this please not only for me but the other 350
>>students
>>> >> who wish to have a simple way to play games in math class and
>>have
>>> more that 3 games.
>>>
>>> OK I understand big groups suck and all but there needs to be a plan
>>for
>>> any future shells so that they are compatible with all shells out
>>> there...Games that are for just one shell are stupid because you
>>lose a
>>> part of you players with that shell change. In buisness you try to
>>never
>>> cut out a part of you consumers...
>>
>
>
>>Well, we aren't gaining anything when more people use our programs.
>>Personally, i don't give a ---- who plays my games, and I'm sure some
>>other programmers have similar feelings.
>>
>>If you would like to make your own shell, then good luck! But asking
>>other people to do it isn't going to get much done, especially when
>>Usgard is such a good shell.
>>
>>--
>>Terry Peng <tpeng@geocities.com>
>>
>LOOK!!!! I'm also a programmer, (for Basic, Pascal, C++, and Java) and I
>care how many people use my software. If I am going to make a program
>and not want money for it I would like as many people as possible to like
>and use it.
>
>-GreenLazer@juno.com
>- "I hate a Roman named Status Quo." -Ray Bradbury
>- If the TI-85 was an egg, it couldn't hatch because it would
>have to many shells!
>
>
---
Evil Jim
Viva La Mexico
<eviljim@writeme.com>
http://members.tripod.com/~eviljim/
I want to die in my sleep like my Grandfather, not screaming in pain like
the passengers in my car...
References: