Re: A85: Interrupt/Usgard-TSR question

Re: A85: Interrupt/Usgard-TSR question

• To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A85: Interrupt/Usgard-TSR question
• From: 82nd Deer <eviljim@megsinet.net>
• Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 23:17:26 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <19971025.232138.9630.0.egillespie@juno.com>
• References: <01BCE17C.C534D6E0.Jeff_Tyrrill@msn.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org

No, you're wrong, it is 200 times per second.  I've made a fairly accurate
clock with it.

At 11:21 PM 10/25/97 -0400, you wrote:
>200 times per second?
>
>When I look at that, I question its validity.  I might be wrong but I
>don't think it's 200 times per second, especially considering that
>computers have 18.2 interrupts each second (this can be temporarily
>changed).  I think 200 is too high, maybe you meant 20 but considering
>we're dealing with a calclulator here I do agree that even 18 interrupts
>might be too many for a calulator to handle in one second, it would
>either miss alot of what's going on trying to keep up or your calculator
>would freeze up trying to complete each interrupt
>
>Wyrmlord
>egillespie@juno.com
>
>

• A85: Interrupt/Usgard-TSR question
• From: Jeff Tyrrill <Jeff_Tyrrill@msn.com>
• Re: A85: Interrupt/Usgard-TSR question
• From: egillespie@juno.com (Erik L Gillespie)

• Prev: Re: A85: Interrupt/Usgard-TSR question
• Next: Re: A85: Link Port
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread