A85: Re: A82: Universal, shmermuniversal....

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

A85: Re: A82: Universal, shmermuniversal....

To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: A85: Re: A82: Universal, shmermuniversal....
From: egillespie@juno.com (Erik L Gillespie)
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 14:21:49 -0400
Cc: assembly-82@lists.ticalc.org, assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org, assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org, assembly-86@lists.ticalc.org, shell-developers@lists.ticalc.org
References: <01BCD69A.07881E00@dial172.bway.net>
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org

i think all of the critics here have the wrong idea

MAYBE IF YOU GIVE SUPPORT ON HOW TO MAKE A UNIVERSAL INSTEAD OF CUTTING
DOWN THE IDEA, JUST MAYBE WE COULD PUT THIS MAILING LIST TO GOOD USE. 
CALL ME CRAZY, BUT I THINK WE SHOULD GIVE SUPPORT TO ANYONE WHO NEEDS
HELP WITH ANYTHING PROPOSED ON THIS MAILING LIST.

Kakos
egillespie@juno.com


Kakos
egillespie@juno.com

Follow-Ups:

Re: A85: Re: A82: Universal, shmermuniversal....

From: mikep@anet-dfw.com (Michael Pearce)

References:

A85: RE: A82: Universal, shmermuniversal....

From: Christopher Kalos <raptorone@geocities.com>