Re: A85: cry for help on XCalc

To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A85: cry for help on XCalc
From: Ben Sferrazza <bens@eden.rutgers.edu>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 23:28:27 -0500
References: <01BCEA3A.C13E0040@dial168.bway.net>
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org

Christopher Kalos wrote:
> 
> well, even though we have made a great deal of progress, XCalc has a major problem , as do the other shell.  Just a little thing known as compatibility.  Now, we can go as far as maybe one shell besides ZShell, and that will likely be Usgard.  So, I have a simple solution.  Rigel and Usgard teams should cooperate with us, and we can get a better shell off the ground without the petty flaming that has gone on recently over the details of address relocation and the like.
> I know that XCalc is still probably being laughed at a bit, but we plan on pulling it off.  We just want the best product for all users and possibly an end to the Shell Wars.
> Christopher Kalos
> raptorone@stuytech.com
> Executive Director/Administrator
> Virtual Technologies Developer's Group

What's the premise behind XCalc?  What are some of its features?  Thanx,
maybe I missed something in the past weeks.

References:

A85: cry for help on XCalc

From: Christopher Kalos <raptorone@stuytech.com>