Re: A85: Ticalc bias

Re: A85: Ticalc bias

• To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: A85: Ticalc bias
• From: 82nd Deer <eviljim@megsinet.net>
• Date: Sat, 01 Nov 1997 16:52:27 -0600
• In-Reply-To: <345c9673.222954957@omega.uta.edu>
• Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org

Usgard has a lot more files out than Rigel or PhatOS, this being the
reason.  The only thing for PhatOS is the shell itself and a few (3 or 4)
programs.  Rigel is the same.  They may be good shells, but having
directories just for 3 or 4 files is kinda pointless.

At 08:56 PM 11/1/97 GMT, you wrote:
>Does anyone else thing that is unfair for ticalc.org to only give
>Usgard its own directories for games and such?  There are some other
>shells out there that are more than just a zshell clone, and they also
>deserve their own directories (most notably, Rigel and PhatOS).  It
>would seem to me that ticalc wants a specific shell to be chosen over
>another.  Of course, that decision should not be imposed by ticalc.
>
>-mike
>mgp4007@omega.uta.edu
>
>

• Re: A85: Ticalc bias
• From: mgp4007@omega.uta.edu (Michael Pearce)

• A85: Ticalc bias
• From: mgp4007@omega.uta.edu (Michael Pearce)

• Prev: RE: A85: Are the radio link plans a hoax?
• Next: Re: A85: Are the radio link plans a hoax?
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread