Re: LZ: Usgard
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LZ: Usgard
Exactly. Then they will be worth it, and I know that they didn't add
size. I just ment to say CShell calls aren't really worth it since many
people still use ZShell and the calls have no use for my programs.
CShell is a great shell, keep up the work. Maybe you could include
library support?
Jim Reardon
jim.reardon@juno.com
Viva La Mexico
http://pages.prodigy.net/eviljim/
We all come into the world the same way - naked, screaming, covered in
blood. But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't have
to end there.
On Wed, 11 Jun 1997 16:54:02 -0500 (CDT) Michael Wyman
<wyma0012@tc.umn.edu> writes:
>On Wed, 11 Jun 1997, Jim Reardon wrote:
>
>> None of the CShell specific calls are worth a wazoo anyway, so I
>call it
>> ZShell development. I do personally use CShell. Or did, anyway.
>
>The CShell specific calls are only those actually used by CShell (they
>
>would have to be in it anyways!), and Keith just shuffled them around
>a bit and documented them...
>
>We don't really expect people to use them, though we will probably add
>
>the ROM calls which fiddle around with memory later (VAR
>deletion/creation/resize...)
>
>~Michael
>
>Cogito, ergo sum. Sum, ergo edo. Cogito, ergo doleo. Cogito sumere
>potum alterum.
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: