Re: LZ: Shell Anarchy!
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LZ: Shell Anarchy!
Micah/Richard Brodsky wrote:
>
> HELP!!!! We're heading straight for shell anarchy!!!!!!!!
> Please don't shudder, but I think there are two terms that could be most
> useful: Standardization and ZShell.
> How about adding a few more people to the ZShell team, for instance, the
> CShell team? ZShell could use improvements, true, but too many shells with
> different extended ROM_CALL sets and non-graph-mem interrupt programming
> methods is asking for lots of trouble, in my opinion. Other features could be
> implemented with, yes, LIBRARIES! What happened to that age old concept, sure
> to be added to a long overdue version of ZShell? How about a version of
> ZShell, 101% backward compatible, with a fixed-location interrupt chaining
> API, library support, and the all-important blessing by the populous? Would
> that be too hard?
Yes... libraries, tsr/interrupt support, APD, RELOCATION (no need to use
PROGRAM_ADDR any more), 44 new rom calls (creating/deleting vars etc)
is a really good idea. I wonder if it's a coincidence that Usgard supports
that!?
--
Jimmy Mårdell "Man is no machine
mailto:mja@algonet.se Man is no God
http://www.algonet.se/~mja Mankind is, and will always be...
IRC: Yarin a pest"
Follow-Ups:
References: