Re: LZ: NASR question
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LZ: NASR question
Well, it doesn't really matter what you use to compile it, there is no
way it can jump relative that far (it is beyond the maximum # of bytes, I
counted :) ).
Jim Reardon
jim.reardon@juno.com
Viva La Mexico
http://pages.prodigy.net/eviljim/
We all come into the world the same way - naked, screaming, covered in
blood. But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't have
to end there.
On Mon, 26 May 1997 22:39:06 -0500 (CDT) Will Stokes
<wstokes@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu> writes:
>this nasr *problem* I don't belive is actually a problem! What?! you
>say?
>Well, yes, I've never gotten it to compile withouth fixing that as
>well
>from jr to jp but I hear some version of tasm on certain machines
>(maybe
>it was just compiling stuff on macs with whatever their inferior
>software
>compiler was). but I have hear of many cases where it will compile
>without
>editing. dunno :)
>
> Biya,
> Will Stokes
> 8^)
> _____________________________________________________
> / /|
> /____________________________________________________/ |
> | | |
> | Will Stokes | |
> | wstokes@geocities.com | |
> | wstokes@vertex.ucls.uchicago.edu | |
> | | |
> | My Personal Homepage | |
> | http://www.uic.edu/~hhstokes/will.htm | |
> | | |
> | The TI-85 Calculator Center | |
> | (the website I maintain and update very often) | |
> | http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/7360/ | |
> | | /
> |____________________________________________________|/
>
>On Sun, 25 May 1997, Jim Reardon wrote:
>
>> There is one small bugger in the NASR.TXT on TiCalc, you need to
>change
>> one of the jr's to JUMP_() statements. I've always had to do this.
>I do
>> not suggest splitting the routines though, just leave them all
>together.
>>
>> Jim Reardon
>> jim.reardon@juno.com
>> Viva La Mexico
>> http://pages.prodigy.net/eviljim/
>> We all come into the world the same way - naked, screaming, covered
>in
>> blood. But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't
>have
>> to end there.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 25 May 1997 15:34:20 -0500 James <james@superb.net> writes:
>> >I have a question about including NASR WARP in my assembly
>programs.
>> >Can
>> >the routines be split into 3 or 4 seperate pieces? I'm asking this
>
>> >because
>> >no matter where I put it in my code, I always get a "range of
>relative
>> >branch exceeded" from somewhere in the program. If I can't split
>the
>> >code,
>> >where should I put it? Thanks for any help you can give me.
>> >
>> >James
>> >
>>
>
>
Follow-Ups:
References: