Re: LZ: NASR question

To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: LZ: NASR question
From: James Sulak <james@superb.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 09:38:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970526223728.9571F-100000@vertex.ucls.uchica go.edu>
References: <19970525.233847.3966.0.Jim.Reardon@juno.com>
Reply-To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org

Yep, that was it.  I should have seen that. Oh well...

James

At 10:39 PM 5/26/97 -0500, you wrote:
>this nasr *problem* I don't belive is actually a problem! What?! you say?
>Well, yes, I've never gotten it to compile withouth fixing that as well
>from jr to jp but I hear some version of tasm on certain machines (maybe
>it was just compiling stuff on macs with whatever their inferior software
>compiler was). but I have hear of many cases where it will compile without
>editing. dunno :)
>
>                             Biya,  
>                               Will Stokes
>
>On Sun, 25 May 1997, Jim Reardon wrote:
>
>> There is one small bugger in the NASR.TXT on TiCalc, you need to change
>> one of the jr's to JUMP_() statements.  I've always had to do this.  I do
>> not suggest splitting the routines though, just leave them all together.
>> 
>> On Sun, 25 May 1997 15:34:20 -0500 James <james@superb.net> writes:
>> >I have a question about including NASR WARP in my assembly programs.  
>> >Can
>> >the routines be split into 3 or 4 seperate pieces?  I'm asking this 
>> >because
>> >no matter where I put it in my code, I always get a "range of relative
>> >branch exceeded" from somewhere in the program.  If I can't split the 
>> >code,
>> >where should I put it?  Thanks for any help you can give me.
>> >
>> >James
>> >
>> 
>

References:

From:

From: