A revelation (was RE: LZ: my 2 frozen cents on USGARD)
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
A revelation (was RE: LZ: my 2 frozen cents on USGARD)
WAIIIIT! What shell does the average TI-85 user have? ZShell 4.0! What don't
they want to deal with? Having to understand more than ZILCH to play Tetris,
Jezzball, Bouderdash! More complexities! Erasing their memory! Libraries and
USGARD are for POWERUSERS and FREAKS! ZShell and CShell are for the MULTITUDES
without graphlinks and CONSERVATIVES! (me, I'm just waiting for a bug-free
USGARD or success with PSOII. I call myself a poweruser with caution and bias)
IM(not so)HO;)
NOTE: I will be away, starting on the 29th of June, for 3 weeks. If I'm lucky,
I'll be able to receive email via brod_sea@scn.org (don't send me much, it
will cost to read/send messages). It will NOT be subscribed list-zshell.
--MZB (micahbro@msn.com)
----------
From: owner-list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org on behalf of James
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 1997 2:50 PM
To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: LZ: my 2 frozen cents on USGARD
>> Please take all flames to _PRIVATE_ discussion.
>
>Well, there are more than one people who needed that message I think :)
>
I agree
>> I'm still using ZShell 4.0, so there! :)
>
>Right! I also used ZShell before Usgard came. No CShell for me - I honor
>the ZShell creaters... much more work behind ZShell than CShell.
>
For better or worse, with the TI-85 nothing is sacred. I switched to
CShell because of it's features, not it's creators. There was probably
more work behind the the first PC compared to it's successors, but most
people don't use 8088 chips anymore. Byte for byte, IMHO CShell is better.
James Sulak
james@superb.net
Follow-Ups: