Re: LZ: New TI-BASIC Compiler
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: LZ: New TI-BASIC Compiler
BASIC doesn't necessarily need to be interpreted...take, for example,
ASIC. To my knowledge, this requires no external libraries.
Jimmy Mårdell wrote:
> Ah... basic must be interpreted... the compiler which creates an exe file of
> a basic files doesn't actually compile the basic program. The EXE file contains
> the interpreter + the basic program in bytecode. QuickBasic for example, does this.
> Visual Basic uses VBRUNx00.DLL, which is the interpretor.
>
References: