Re: LZ: New TI-BASIC Compiler


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: LZ: New TI-BASIC Compiler



I personally think that a BASIC compiler is a great idea. It would let all of the current BASIC programs run at twice their speed, and allow programmers to get more math related software done faster.

And as to it all fitting on the calculator, I agree that it probaly wouldn't fit. But how about the compiler being PC based and have it open 85p files? That would allow it to be as big as necessary. It could work similar to TASM -> actually, it could just generate Asm code and then call TASM to make the compiled code.

Just my thoughts

Richard

TIonline
http://tionline.home.ml.org/
The NEWEST TI calculator site available on the Internet
Changing every day, so visit often
 
Just opened 6/18/97 - Check it out
 

----
From: Henry Zektser <henryz@fermi.walkersville.fr.k12.md.us>
To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org
Date: Wednesday, June 18, 1997 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: LZ: New TI-BASIC Compiler

i personally agree with the fact that TI-BASIC would be kinda useless. as
far as developing a c++ compiler for the ti, let's see someone put all
that parsing and tokenizing into 32K of memory with enough of the memory
left to hold the object code and the finished program. Also, remember, no
one is going to use something that takes up 90%  of their memory (ahem
usgard with the fancy shell and all the libs -- i happen to like the small
shell a lot tho)

--<Henry Zektser>--
-----!<<cgiman>>!-----
hz@ns1.wanfear.com   henryz@fermi.walkersville.fr.k12.md.us
                                                              _( (~\
       _ _                        /                          ( \> > \
   -/~/ / ~\                     :;                \       _  > /(~\/
  || | | /\ ;\                   |l      _____     |;     ( \/    > >
  _\\)\)\)/ ;;;                  `8o __-~     ~\   d|      \      //
///(())(__/~;;\                  "88p;.  -. _\_;.oP        (_._/ /
(((__   __ \\   \                  `>,% (\  (\./)8"         ;:'  i
)))--`.'-- (( ;,8 \               ,;%%%:  ./V^^^V'          ;.   ;.
((\   |   /)) .,88  `: ..,,;;;;,-::::::'_::\   ||\         ;[8:   ;
)|  ~-~  |(|(888; ..``'::::8888oooooo.  :\`^^^/,,~--._    |88::  |
|\ -===- /|  \8;; ``:.      oo.8888888888:`((( o.ooo8888Oo;:;:'  |
|_~-___-~_|   `-\.   `        `o`88888888b` )) 888b88888P""'     ;
; ~~~~;~~         "`--_`.       b`888888888;(.,"888b888"  ..::;-'
   ;      ;              ~"-....  b`8888888:::::.`8888. .:;;;''
      ;    ;                 `:::. `:::OOO:::::::.`OO' ;;;''
:       ;                     `.      "``::::::''    .'
    ;                           `.   \_              /
  ;       ;                       +:   ~~--  `:'  -';
                                   `:         : .::/ 
      ;                            ;;+_  :::. :..;;;
                                   ;;;;;;,;;;;;;;;,;



On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Betten wrote:

> Martin,
> Why are you interested in programming a compiler for TI-BASIC programs?
> It seems to me that the majority of the people that are subscribed to this
> mailing list are not content to program in TI-BASIC at all and have moved
> on to mainly programming in Z80 assembly language.  I can see that there
> might be some interest from some of the less intelligent TI-85 users in a
> TI-BASIC compiler, but I would advise not putting much effort into it.
> Honestly, I would work on creating or improving a TI-85 C++ compiler,
> because, in my opinion, C++ is a much better computer programming language
> than BASIC.  If you would be interested in coding a C++ compiler for the
> TI-85 then I would be interested in lending some help to the project.
> Sincerely,
> Steven Betten
> <sgbetten@hotmail.com>
> <betten5@mindspring.com>
>


Follow-Ups: