Re: A85: USGard vs. ZShell

To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A85: USGard vs. ZShell
From: Mike Matz <picasso@centuryinter.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 1997 22:42:20 -0700
Reply-To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org

At 5:18 PM on 12/4/97, Chris James wrote:

> Sounds great.  I've tried to learn zshell, but it just didn't make sense
>to me.
>
>
> At 08:10 PM 12/3/97 -0500, you wrote:
> >^^^^^^ Note the spelling correction.
> >
> >I'm going to create a language similar to C/C++ that will compile into
> >asm files.  ...
> >...

Aren't there already a few of these such programs out there?  First of all,
I've used USUL a little bit and it seems to be a simple and fairly complete
high-level language to produce Usgard asm files.  Also, (correct me if I'm
wrong) aren't there one or two C-like programs?  I know I have three
different ones on my PC (which I can only use weekends), but one or two of
them is for 68k asm.  Before you go off and write your own C/C++ asm
'compiler,' look around to see if you need to, or if you could get any
ideas from these that are already made. (hey, I'm not telling you not to do
it, just don't re-do it :)

Mike Matz

Follow-Ups:

Re: A85: USGard vs. ZShell

From: 82nd Deer <eviljim@megsinet.net>