RE: A85: Re: Thought on Usgard
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A85: Re: Thought on Usgard
It didn't work :-)
Andreas
----------
From: Michael Pearce[SMTP:mikep@anet-dfw.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 09, 1997 2:53 AM
To: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A85: Re: Thought on Usgard
What problems arose?
-mike
On Fri, 8 Aug 1997 13:35:40 +0200, you wrote:
>I've actually tried that, but without success :-(
> Andreas
>----------------
>E-Mail: ess.andreas@computerhaus.at
>Webpage: http://andi.ganymed.org
>
>----------
>> Von: Michael Pearce <mikep@anet-dfw.com>
>> An: assembly-85@lists.ticalc.org
>> Betreff: A85: Thought on Usgard
>> Datum: Friday, August 08, 1997 8:46 AM
>>
>> In version 0.95 of Usgard, it says:
>> "Once there are no ZShell specific programs left, we can reduce
>> Usgard's size by another by 100 bytes.(ROM emulation, CALL_s,
>> JUMP_s...)"
>>
>> First of all, there is no way that Zshell specific programs will ever
>> leave us. There is no such thing as extinct software. (a good
>> example is the whole year 2000 bug.) But anyways, it would be nice to
>> have the kernel smaller. Would it be possible for Andreas to put all
>> of the Zshell specific compatability code into a separate string?
>> Kind of like a ZShell library. Then, the only way you need this
>> library is if you are running older ZShell programs. If you are only
>> running Usgard specific programs, there is no need for the Zshell
>> library (and the extra 100 bytes). Just a thought.
>>
>> -mike
>
- Warning
- Could not process part with given Content-Type:
application/ms-tnef