Re: LZ: More RAM

Subject: Re: LZ: More RAM
From: David Madsen <madsend@toast16.oremhs.alpine.k12.ut.us>
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 17:57:48 -0600 (MDT)
In-Reply-To: <2D34895D.201D4685@foma.wsc.mass.edu>

Linux rules.. Everyone should have it. :)


On Wed, 12 Jan 1994, Steve Wrobleski wrote:


> list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org wrote:
> > 
> > -> > IN>He sure did.  The gist of it was "Nobody will ever need more
> > -> than 640K of > IN>memory."  And that's why we still have the 640K
> > -> barrier to this day. >
> > -> > IN>--timmyt
> > -> >
> > -> >
> > -> > I'm confused. 640k of what? It can't be RAM or hardrive. So what is
> > -> it?
> > -> Conventional RAM memory. A pain in the neck for us who use
> > -> DOS/Windows...
> > 
> > Well, not 95 or NT.
> 
> Well, if youre using NT or 95, you have other problems (mainly that your
> state institution closed down due to lack of funding.) I use dos/win 3.1
> (I only use win 3.1 to send stuff to and fro my ti-85. go figgure) The
> 640k isnt much of a pain to me. I mostly use linux though.
>

References:

From:

Prev: Re: LZ: Compression program
Next: Re: LZ: anybody want to chat on IRC(in chat rooms #calcti or #
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread