Re: LZ: More RAM
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
On 3 Sep 96 at 14:18, vikings@undergnd.metrobbs.com wrote:
> IN>He sure did. The gist of it was "Nobody will ever need more than 640K of
> IN>memory." And that's why we still have the 640K barrier to this day.
>
> IN>--timmyt
>
>
> I'm confused. 640k of what? It can't be RAM or hardrive. So what is it?
Conventional RAM memory. A pain in the neck for us who use
DOS/Windows...
Regards,
Mattias Lindqvist
CS student at LTH, Sweden
E-mail: d96mli@efd.lth.se
References: