RE: LZ: More RAM
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: LZ: More RAM
-
Subject: RE: LZ: More RAM
-
From: Micah/Richard Brodsky <Micahbro@msn.com>
-
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 96 21:12:40 UT
-
In-Reply-To: <>
Do you use Windows95, Mac (barf), or UNIX (I think. I don't use it)? None of
them have that barrier for anything (Windows95 has that barrier for old
programs, of course, but each one gets 640k, not every program sharing 640k).
----------
From: owner-list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org on behalf of
vikings@undergnd.metrobbs.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 1996 12:18 PM
To: list-zshell@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: LZ: More RAM
IN>> "Isn't 28K enough for anybody"
IN>> by Carl Turner
IN>>
IN>>I think bill gates said something simalar
IN>He sure did. The gist of it was "Nobody will ever need more than 640K of
IN>memory." And that's why we still have the 640K barrier to this day.
IN>--timmyt
I'm confused. 640k of what? It can't be RAM or hardrive. So what is it?
David