Re: LZ: Why TI doesn't support ZShell...

Subject: Re: LZ: Why TI doesn't support ZShell...
From: Jordan Adema <jadema@grfn.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 1996 14:16:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <199610130311.FAA14236@defiant.rbk.sollentuna.se>

At 8:51 PM -0600 on 10/12/96, Zenon Lynx wrote:




> Yes.  It's the "user friendly" atmosphere being traded in for the "power"
> bit that those things lack.  TI-85 and 92 is the way to go!
>
> "Honors Master PhD of Idea Engineering"
> -= Zenon@bbs.nexes.com =-


I guess it depends what you mean by "easy". I think the *85's* menues are
easier--like a mac, you can still see the rest of the screen while you are
operating it. The 82 is more like a DOS game or something.


+--------------+--------------------------+----------------------------------+
| Jordan Adema | <a href="mailto://jadema@grfn.org">mailto://jadema@grfn.org</a> | http://www.calvin.edu/~sadema21/ |
+--------------+--------------------------+----------------------------------+g

References:

Re: LZ: Why TI doesn't support ZShell...

From: Zenon Lynx <Zenon@bbs.nexes.com>

Prev: LZ: Ram Expander File System
Next: Re: LZ: RT-Link: Has anybody gotten it to work?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread