Re: LZ: JR or JP?
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Marc Heikens wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if there's a reason to use JP instead of JR for a program
> jump? The JR instruction, according to the book I have, uses one less byte
> to have in code, so that would help optimize memory; also the assembler
> resolves the relative (JR) addresses for you, doesn't it?
>
> -----
> Marc Heikens
> kheikens@3-cities.com
try CALL_(addr) to replace jr if you are planning on using jr in your
programs because CALL_(addr) does not have a limited range like jr does.
See the file TI-85.H for more information on this which is available at
TICALC.ORG.
PCoMP
Visis Maximus Productions home page at: http://www.ntsource.com/~pcomp
References: