[A83] Re: allocating uninitialized memory? + _insertmem

To: "Assembly-83 list" <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: [A83] Re: allocating uninitialized memory? + _insertmem
From: "Patai Gergely" <patai_gergely@fastmail.fm>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 09:56:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20030601104228.50357e42.tijl@ulyssis.org>
References: <000b01c32747$2acd8860$6401a8c0@devbox> <Law11-F49MRmuhXuWDZ0003f87d@hotmail.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20030531093607.00a51550@pop.comcast.net> <003701c327b2$0c492cd0$62f9c594@SOFTIE> <001001c327c9$8dbb7bd0$01891581@BSTERNERL> <20030601104228.50357e42.tijl@ulyssis.org>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

> how about opening an edit buffer?  i don't believe these modify the
> vat, they simply keep you from creating or removing variables, pushing
> or popping anything on fp or op stacks.  Then you'll have all the free
> ram on the calc to work with.  you wouldn't be able to use absolute
> addressing on this ram though.
Why bother when you can directly access the free RAM?

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Sent 0.000002 seconds ago

References:

[A83] Re: allocating uninitialized memory? + _insertmem

From: Brandon Sterner <bms9019@rit.edu>

[A83] Re: allocating uninitialized memory? + _insertmem

From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>

Prev: [A83] Re: allocating uninitialized memory? + _insertmem
Next: [A83] Re: allocating uninitialized memory? + _insertmem
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread