[A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.

[A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.

• To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Matthew Marshall" <mmarshall@myrealbox.com>
• Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 12:49:42 -0500
• References: <000801c36115$47e1e560$16fe8842@kcll><Law11-OE583CqUAynSq0001e4a8@hotmail.com><002101c361b3$670f44c0$16fe8842@kcll> <20030813181631.734a8402.tijl@ulyssis.org>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

> That's correct. Sure the byte you save with jr is often more
> important than the loss of 2 clock cycles.

I don't know.  I am writing an app that is very performance intensive...
every cycle counts.  Especially if it is in code that is executed several
hundred times per second.  That is about .000166 seconds gained or lost with
two cycles!  OK, so maybe you're right.

MWM

• [A83] Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Matthew Marshall" <mmarshall@myrealbox.com>
• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Jeff" <telepath75@hotmail.com>
• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Matthew Marshall" <mmarshall@myrealbox.com>
• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@ulyssis.org>

• Prev: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• Next: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread