[A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.

[A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.

• To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: Martin <iemandiemand@xs4all.nl>
• Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:13:26 +0200
• In-Reply-To: <002101c361b3$670f44c0$16fe8842@kcll>
• References: <000801c36115$47e1e560$16fe8842@kcll> <Law11-OE583CqUAynSq0001e4a8@hotmail.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

That depends on whether or not the jump is taken, jr is 7/12 tstates while 
jp is always 10.

Martin

At 10:43 AM 8/13/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Thanks for the reply... but one of your statements gave me a little turmoil:
>
> >  - relative jumps (jr) are smaller and faster than absolute jumps (jp).
>
>WHAT!!!  I thought that jr took 12 cycles while jp took 10!  (Less if the
>address is pointed to by a register, I think.)
>
>MWM

• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Matthew Marshall" <mmarshall@myrealbox.com>

• [A83] Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Matthew Marshall" <mmarshall@myrealbox.com>
• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Jeff" <telepath75@hotmail.com>
• [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• From: "Matthew Marshall" <mmarshall@myrealbox.com>

• Prev: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• Next: [A83] Re: Signed division by a power of two.
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread