[A83] Re: On calc.

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: On calc.
From: Gavin Olson <gtolson@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 18:26:35 -0400
In-reply-to: <20030407230247.5330892c.peter.ankerstal@edu.ljusdal.se>
References: <" <4837005.1049741397774.JavaMail.nobody"@wamui06.slb.atl.earthlink.net> <4837005.1049741397774.JavaMail.nobody@wamui06.slb.atl.earthlink.net>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

At 11:02 PM 4/7/2003 +0200, you wrote:
>tnx. Is there any example of useful code? =).
>And where can I read about the syntax?
>On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:50:27 -0400 (EDT)
>nickptar@mindspring.com wrote:

Hand assembly generally requires a doc about the instruction set's binary 
conversion.  I have one for the x86 asm class I'm taking, and basically 
there is a table with all the instructions and their many operand combo 
listed out, and you pick the appropriate segments to form the 
instruction.  Then you reference other tables for the bits to fill in 
specific fields, like a register or a memory location.  A real pain, 
that.  And, of course, it all has to be done before calculating and filling 
in your jumps.

Follow-Ups:

[A83] Re: On calc.

From: Ronald Teune <RTWolf@gmx.net>

References:

[A83] Re: On calc.

From: nickptar@mindspring.com

[A83] Re: On calc.

From: Peter =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ankerst=E5l?= <peter.ankerstal@george.ljusdal.se>