[A83] Re: windows programmation [OT]

[A83] Re: windows programmation [OT]

• To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: [A83] Re: windows programmation [OT]
• From: Olle Hedman <alh@home.se>
• Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 19:56:15 +0100
• In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020127135406.02b56af0@pop.snet.net>
• References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020127014600.00b70858@pop.home.se> <001701c1a6ca$d84a30f0$3e891581@BSTERNERL> <200201262308.g0QN8m715710@sunsparc.hysoft-automation.com>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

At 19:54 2002-01-27, you wrote:
>Speaking of confused language names, is there a relationship between C# (I
>saw a Dummies book for it at the bookstore today) and C(++)?

yes, it is,  C# is supposed to be the next generation of C++
At least Microsoft wants it to be.
I don't know more then that about it though.
I heard it looks like somewhat of a mix between Java and C++.

///Olle

• [A83] Re: windows programmation [OT]
• From: "Tijl Coosemans" <tijl@ulyssis.org>

• [A83] Re: windows programmation [OT]
• From: Olle Hedman <alh@home.se>
• [A83] Re: windows programmation [OT]
• From: Brandon Sterner <bms9019@rit.edu>
• [A83] Re: windows programmation [OT]
• From: Peter-Martijn Kuipers <hyper@hbyte.net>
• [A83] Re: windows programmation [OT]
• From: Gavin Olson <gtolson@snet.net>

• Prev: [A83] Re: x86 floating points [OT]
• Next: [A83] Re: windows programmation [OT]
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread