[A83] Re: Version Numbers
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[A83] Re: Version Numbers
Versions less than 1 (major version number) are beta and/or alpha
versions...Typically you start at 0.1 or so and then increment. When you
have your first public release you go to 1.0
Michael Vincent
Detached Solutions - www.detacheds.com
Radical Software - www.radicalsoft.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Lutz" <tlutz@stevens-tech.edu>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:37 PM
Subject: [A83] Re: Version Numbers
>
> Thanks....but where do versions <1 come into play?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
> [mailto:assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org] On Behalf Of Michael
> Vincent
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:35 PM
> To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
> Subject: [A83] Re: Version Numbers
>
>
> Generally you use the format X.yy.zz where X is your major version, yy
> your
> minor, and zz is the build. For example, the first released version is
> 1.0.0. If you make a very minor change and rebuild your program you have
> 1.0.1. If you make some majorish minor changes then you have 1.1.0 (or
> 1.1).
> If you add a bunch of features or recode your whole program or something
> it's a major change and you'd go to 2.0. Ideally that's what you do but
> that's not always followed...And when programs get up to 8.0 or 11.0 or
> such
> some companies start over at 1.0 but add "Pro" to the name or other such
> identifier.
>
> Michael Vincent
> Detached Solutions - www.detacheds.com
> Radical Software - www.radicalsoft.org
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Lutz" <tlutz@stevens-tech.edu>
> To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 9:00 PM
> Subject: [A83] Version Numbers
>
>
> > Is there any kind of plan one should follow when tagging a program
> with
> > a version number? (i.e. where does the 4.0 come in Windows NT)?
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
References: