[A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: [A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]
From: "Tijl Coosemans" <tijl@ulyssis.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 12:19:46 +0100
References: <20020110102342.32342.qmail@web13805.mail.yahoo.com> <00a901c199c1$e792cce0$d905040a@tijl> <000601c199c2$4a58c000$6501a8c0@brinstar>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


> > They called it Voyage 200 for the same reason MS called WinNT 5.1:
Windows
> > XP. The name implies a powerful product, where TI92+SE, while the most
> > logic one to choose, feels empty.

> Why NT 5.1 instead of NT 6.0?

I've never seen Windows XP in the access logs of my website, but I do see
Windows NT 5.1. Win2K is listed as Windows NT 5.0 and I don't know of any
upgrade or something, so I guess NT 5.1 is winXP.

> Although XP is in almost every way a downgrade...

Names don't say everything...

References:

[A83] Re: VoyageT_200

From: Burak "Gül" <eniyi@yahoo.com>

[A83] Re: VoyageT_200

From: "Tijl Coosemans" <tijl@ulyssis.org>

[A83] Re: VoyageT_200 [OT]

From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>