[A83] Re: fschk83

[A83] Re: fschk83

• To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: [A83] Re: fschk83
• From: "Michael Vincent" <hookman@worldnet.att.net>
• Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:11:52 -0700
• Organization: Detached Solutions
• References: <000201c1b93a$813bb4a0$080a0a0a@ronald> <5.1.0.14.0.20020220045736.029e72b0@pop.snet.net>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

Actually the calculator would be probably noticeably faster with sorting.
The PRGM menu would display faster, and MirageOS sort would be much
quicker...

Michael Vincent
Detached Solutions - www.detacheds.com
Radical Software - www.radicalsoft.org www.michaelv.org
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gavin Olson" <gtolson@snet.net>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 2:58 AM
Subject: [A83] Re: fschk83


>
> At 08:03 PM 2/20/02 +0100, you wrote:
>
> > > another idea: a defragmenter. Wouldn't the calc be faster
> >if you have lots
> > > of programs and they are all sorted alphabetically?
> >
> >Probably you are going too far in the analogy. :)
> >
> >PG
>
>
> No, because all locations of memory can be accessed at the same
> speed.  This is how that nifty SCSI drive in the latest Maximum PC hit a
> seek time of .02ms in all situations.  Contiguity is not an issue (and all
> calc files are contiguous)
>
>
>

• [A83] Re: fschk83
• From: "Thomas Lutz" <tlutz@stevens-tech.edu>

• [A83] Re: fschk83
• From: "Ronald Teune" <rtwolf@gmx.net>
• [A83] Re: fschk83
• From: Gavin Olson <gtolson@snet.net>

• Prev: [A83] Re: fschk83
• Next: [A83] Re: fschk83
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread