[A83] Re: call vs. bcall()

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: [A83] Re: call vs. bcall()
From: "Scott Dial" <scott@scottdial.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 01:36:17 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <F146K5zQEevxcVeuuLt000010c7@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

Well.. that's true but the actual routines ret back to the bcall routine
which flips the correct rom page back in and then jumps back to the next
instruction after the call. His point is that it is more complicated
than a direct mirror of bcall/bjump to call/jp.

--
Scott Dial
scott@scottdial.com
AIM GeekMug : ICQ# 3608935

-----Original Message-----
From: assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org] On Behalf Of Dan Weiss
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 7:58 PM
To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: call vs. bcall()

There is no b_ret.  Plain old 'ret' is used to return from a bcall.




_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 3 months FREE*. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus&xAPID=42&PS=47575&PI=7324&DI=74
74&SU= 
http://www.hotmail.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg&HL=1216hotmailtaglines_viruspr
otection_3mf

References:

[A83] Re: call vs. bcall()

From: "Dan Weiss" <dwedit@hotmail.com>