[A83] Re: NimbusOS
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[A83] Re: NimbusOS
Yes in deed, it's amazing how far the discussions here stray ;)
NimbusOS has it's own forum, visit http://forums.calcbasic.com and =
navigate to the
NimbusOS section of the web board. Request libraries, suggest new =
features and discuss
everything else related to it.
We also have released beta 4 of NimbusOS for download exclusively at our =
site.
http://cirrus.tigalaxy.com/nimbusb4.htm
Regards from David L and the rest of the NimbusOS development team.
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Aaron Fineman" <amfineman@earthlink.net>
To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 5:11 PM
Subject: [A83] Re: NimbusOS [OT]
>=20
> That was an interesting conversation.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henk Poley" <hpoley@dds.nl>
> To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 8:15 AM
> Subject: [A83] Re: NimbusOS [OT]
>=20
>=20
> >
> > Been away for two and a half weeks, so sorry for the 'old post'.
> >
> > > Van: David Phillips <david@acz.org>
> > >
> > > I don't see why it is so difficult to call the calculators by =
their
> > > proper names.
> >
> > Uhm, almost all Ti83+ newbies on this list think that everything =
made for
> > the Ti83 runs also on the Ti83+ (so they post their question with =
"Ti83",
> > or just no name). And off coarse -in general- it does, when =
reassembled
> > with the correct includefiles/header. So when someone posts some =
routine
> on
> > this list it is meant to run on both (or better all three) of the =
Ti83s.
> > Thats why this is a "shared list" between the Ti83, Ti83+ and Ti83+
> > SE.
> >
> > So to stop being mistaken by the particular 'calculator species' we =
add
> the
> > minus sign, to make sure we all get the messages that it is not made =
to
> run
> > on the Ti83+ nor Ti83+ SE.
> >
> > This is more convenient than adding sentences like "This code is for =
the
> > Ti83 only (so not the Ti83+(SE)", I guess...
> >
> > And last, why bother? Everybody seems to understand this better than =
the
> > 'official' notation. And off coarse, you are free to chose to "use =
it" or
> > not.
> >
> > At least this thread seems to have revived the list ;-)
> >
> > Henk Poley <><
> >
> > PS: Sorry Aaron...
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
References: