[A83] Re: Aurora for 83+?

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: [A83] Re: Aurora for 83+?
From: "Henk Poley" <HPoley@DDS.nl>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 12:57:49 +0200
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


> Van: Ronald Teune <RTWolf@gmx.net>
> 
> > it would plot some things, depending on what you had set in the real
> > REAL V, it would use REAL A,B,C and D to plot/erase certain
> > things, like (filled) squares.
> > 
> > This way of 'destroying valuable REALs' is a bit redundant I
> > think/hope. You could also addapt some pointers to let the TIOS
> > jump over the data-part needed by your assembly program.
> > 
> > The parsing of the input-data is a little bit of a problem, but maybe
> > somebody already has found the call to let the TIOS parse the string
> > for you till a comma or whatever, and put the result in OP1.
> 
> Maybe a list is useful.

???

> > Yuo could also be a little confused about the "prgmBLAH" being
> > assembly? Well, I've worked to much with Venus lately. Oh, to
> > speak about Venus, does anybody know if the Ti83+ can execute
> > BASIC programs in Flash from RAM?
> 
> No, it can't, and imho that's extremely stupid, because basic isn't
> selfmodding

Whoops, needed to be "does anybody know if the Ti83+ can execute BASIC
programs in Flash (directly) from the TIOS?"

Don't know how I got to changing 'the TIOS' to 'RAM', but ah well, I was in
a hurry...

It hought I've read somewhere that some of Ti's apps are BASIC-apps. If
these weren't just a small "parse the following as BASIC" assembly part,
with a bigger BASIC part just after it, I didn't/don't know...

BTW: For Venus it does matter if can be done...

	Henk Poley <><

Follow-Ups:

[A83] Re: Aurora for 83+?

From: Ronald Teune <RTWolf@gmx.net>