[A83] Re: ld hl,bc

[A83] Re: ld hl,bc

• To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
• Subject: [A83] Re: ld hl,bc
• From: "David Phillips" <david@acz.org>
• Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 21:40:41 -0700
• References: <007001c0de19$27272780$daa674d5@qxd2j>
• Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

If you must...

.addinstr LD BC,DE 424B 2 NOP 1
.addinstr LD BC,HL 444D 2 NOP 1
.addinstr LD DE,BC 5059 2 NOP 1
.addinstr LD DE,HL 545D 2 NOP 1
.addinstr LD HL,BC 6069 2 NOP 1
.addinstr LD HL,DE 626B 2 NOP 1

> Why not just 'ld hl, bc' ?

• [A83] Re: ld hl,bc
• From: Hyperbyte <central@hyperfield.com>

• [A83] Re: ld hl,bc
• From: "Ronald Teune" <rtwolf@gmx.net>

• Prev: [A83] Re: ld hl,bc
• Next: [A83] Re: ld hl,bc
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread