[A83] Re: 83 help
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[A83] Re: 83 help
Pictures may seem large when uncompiled. But when compiled, a raw
monochrome 96x64 image is exactly 768 bytes long. You can get it even
smaller with Image Studio through RLE compression, and the decompressor is
less than 32 bytes!
I don't want to put you down, sorry if this makes you feel real stupid, but
are you actually compiling it with TASM, or just converting the source code
into a .83P file? What you wrote makes it sound like the latter! (3k
pictures from 96x64 monochrome images)
I've made some pretty stupid mistakes myself (like backwards ld's)...
>From: "Dustin Davis" <titan2782@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
>To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
>Subject: [A83] Re: 83 help
>Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:11:56 -0800
>
>
>ok, the picture is 830 in a 1 bit monochrome bitmap. It is about 3k in
>ascii
>and i havent tried to compile it yet, but when i used pic83 on the 256
>bitmaps, the asm file was about 3k also and it compiled into the 83p file
>as
>3k so each pic was 3k. And also, D Weiss, i'm not stupid, i am a 2 time
>award winning software developer, i know you cant put binary files into a
>TI83 program. I dont treat anyone else like they are stupid, plz dont treat
>me as i am stupid. Ok and as i said, i just compiled it using the bmp2z80
>program. it still compiled into a 3k file, the 830 bmp goes to 3k ascii and
>it makes the 83p file another 3k bigger. So i get the same results as i did
>with the other converters. Any other suggestions?
>
>Dustin Davis
>Lead Software Developer
>Vision Works Studios
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Follow-Ups: