[A83] Re: Linux

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

[A83] Re: Linux


I only have one thing to say: right about at this point when we're talking 
about color screens, bigger screens, etc, etc, etc...  Why don't you just 
get a PDA?  I would personally suggest a Handspring, Platinum or Prism if 
you can afford it (16-bit color, baby).  That way, in case you still care 
at all about doing "real" math, you can buy yourself the powerOne Graphing 
Calculator Springboard module.  Assuming that any of us would actually us 
our calcs for math anyhow.

Eric Tollefson
CmdrERT01@yahoo.com

At 10:21 AM 3/6/2001 +0100, you wrote:

> > OK, heres a question, after installing Linux/Dos, would the calc have
> > any memory after the install to be able to use it?
>
>Would we want a *full* DOS??? I mean with prompt, etc.
>Using your calc as a text-editor is already 'pain-in-the-ass', so typing
>every command will be, hmmm... erm... think of something yourself...
>
> > and besides that, we would
> > have to worry about the graphics modes? lets just think about this,8 bits
> > per pixel, 64000 pixels(320x200) that comes out to be...512000 bits!
>
>Why would we want 8-bit graphics if we only have black&white???
>Okay, we CAN do some very flickering greyscale (4 layers, whoowww).
>But would we really want that? And would we use 8 bits per pixel... (2 bits
>per pixel would be enough for 4 layers of grey)
>
>Of coarse, we could say "Ti must not only build-in a DOS, it should also
>build-in a color screen!". But think about the enormous power consumption,
>most color-PDA's with Lithium-ionide batteries take only 2-4 days to drain
>it...
>Gonna need a LOT of batteries. (I know Li-batteries are rechargeable, but
>you'll need some spare ones, for if your calc dies under a math-test...)
>
>Color-displays are more difficult to make, so your Ti would get way more
>expensive...
>
>Besides that, the Ti-83(+) (SE) has only 62x94... Would we want an emulated
>bigger screen, so you need to scroll around that? Okay, we could say "well,
>Ti should also build in a bigger screen!".
>
>It would use some extra power, and -indeed- bigger displays are more
>difficult to make, so your Ti would get way more expensive... (hey, have
>heard that before ;)
>
> > now, I'm not
> > sure if the ti's have enough ram to just hold the current amount of data
> > for that, none the less have the pointer specs. If i'm not mistaken, TI
> > would have to upgrade the ram, just to hold it, and that means that it
> > then moves the pointer out of range(the ram would go past 0xFFFF)
> > and if they did raise the max, how would it access the extra ram?
> > (after all the max any combo of registers can go is 0xFFFF if i'm
> > not mistaken)
>
>Hmm, well if you WOULD like to have 8-bit color then you'll need 64000
>bytes (62,5kb), which is almost the maximum adressing range of the Z80
>(64kb)
>
>You would also have to transfer that data to the display, which would be
>very very slow... (Yes, memory mapped LCD, okay... but also then it would
>be a bit of a 'no go')
>
>         Henk Poley
>
> > I'm sure this also goes for Linux, though i'm not sure.
> > Well anyways, thats my bit of wisdom when it comes to dos oh well.


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
References: