[A83] Re: Z88DK vs. SDCC
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
[A83] Re: Z88DK vs. SDCC
http://sdcc.sourceforge.net but it currently doesn't have any TI specific
support routines.
-----Original Message-----
From: assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Ronald Teune
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:00 AM
To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: Z88DK vs. SDCC
Where can I get it?
>I'm not saying you should defect, but I was curious why z88dk instead of
>sdcc or retargeting gcc. I compiled an arithmetic decoder from C into Z80
>using sdcc, it seems to work great... If I ever needed a C compiler, sdcc
is
>definitely what I'd use. The only (useful) library functions missing seem
to
>be puts and putc, which can easily be implemented in terms of the ROM
calls.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
>[mailto:assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Henk Poley
>Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:06 AM
>To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
>Subject: [A83] Re: Z88DK vs. SDCC
>
>I know SDCC is soo much better (on some parts), but it has a smaller
>library, and major parts of it are only written to work on the GB-Z80...
>
>Okaym I could now just say "bye" and 'run-away' with the Z88DK lib to the
>SDCC, and see if that could bring some new life into that compiler... I
>might have some problems with the IX register, *major* parts of the Z88DK
>use this reg for all sorts of things.
>
> Henk Poley
>
>
>
References: