[A83] Re: Z88DK vs. SDCC

To: <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Subject: [A83] Re: Z88DK vs. SDCC
From: "Kirk Meyer" <kirk.meyer@colorado.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 07:05:26 -0600
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <0f9745948060a71NET90S@hetnet.nl>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org


I'm not saying you should defect, but I was curious why z88dk instead of
sdcc or retargeting gcc. I compiled an arithmetic decoder from C into Z80
using sdcc, it seems to work great... If I ever needed a C compiler, sdcc is
definitely what I'd use. The only (useful) library functions missing seem to
be puts and putc, which can easily be implemented in terms of the ROM calls.

-----Original Message-----
From: assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org
[mailto:assembly-83-bounce@lists.ticalc.org]On Behalf Of Henk Poley
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 12:06 AM
To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: [A83] Re: Z88DK vs. SDCC

I know SDCC is soo much better (on some parts), but it has a smaller
library, and major parts of it are only written to work on the GB-Z80...

Okaym I could now just say "bye" and 'run-away' with the Z88DK lib to the
SDCC, and see if that could bring some new life into that compiler... I
might have some problems with the IX register, *major* parts of the Z88DK
use this reg for all sorts of things.

	Henk Poley

References:

[A83] Re: Z88DK vs. SDCC

From: "Henk Poley" <HPoley@DDS.nl>