Re: A83: 83+ midi player
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A83: 83+ midi player
$^&%$! oops - that sentence should be:
are the basic capabilities of calcmod not enough for your midi purposes?
:-)
Frank Schoep
====================
If you're better than anyone else,
what's the point in wasting time
pretending to be ordinary
====================
dsfs98@concepts.nl
http://home.concepts.nl/~dsfs98
====================
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Frank Schoep <dsfs98@concepts.nl>
Aan: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
Datum: maandag 22 januari 2001 17:49
Onderwerp: Re: A83: 83+ midi player
>
>sorry to interupt, but the basic capabilities of calcmod are not
>enough for your midi purposes.
>
>(this letter is probably replied to the wrong person - sorry)
>
>Frank Schoep
>====================
>OASIS.
>====================
>dsfs98@concepts.nl
>http://home.concepts.nl/~dsfs98
>====================
>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>Van: Linus Akesson <lairfight@softhome.net>
>Aan: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org <assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org>
>Datum: maandag 22 januari 2001 16:20
>Onderwerp: Re: A83: 83+ midi player
>
>
>>
>>In accordance with the prophecy, D Weiss uttered:
>>
>>> You would only get 2 channels if you're lucky.
>>
>>You could mix any number of channels (all with different stereo
positions),
>in
>>realtime, into two channels. Then, to save CPU power, you could have
>>precalculated samples in RAM (Fourier-transformed to save space). Assuming
>you
>>have new batteries, you could then fly to work on your bewinged pig
Swilma.
>>
>>Seriously, in reply to dArkSk8eR, if someone would manage to write an '83
>MIDI
>>player, I'd be flabberghasted. The limit of 2 channels is immaterial,
>though.
>>
>>Linus
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>>"The Air Force is reacting to the EPA ban on CFC's by replacing
>>them in the cooling systems of the intercontinental (ballistic)
>>missiles with 2 to 10 nuclear warheads on board. If they are ever
>>fired, it will be an environmentally friendly nuclear holocaust,
>>not threatening the Ozone layer."
>> -- Access to Energy, July 1993
>>
>>
>
>