[A83] Re: Small C?


[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

[A83] Re: Small C?




> well, c is easier to read then asm, and it's easier to 
get into and program 
> for.
> while on the other hand, asm is normally faster and tends 
to be smaller.
That's not a surprise for me. However, for such
"little" machines assembly is the only competent
solution.






References: