RE: A83: Ti8xcc [82/83/83+/85/86]
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
RE: A83: Ti8xcc [82/83/83+/85/86]
I think "Professional" is the right word...
>> > 8. nearly all of TISCO is not finished, Ti8xcc is a bit more like a
>> > 'comercial' compiler.
>>
>> Oh yeah, we need to think of ourselves as 'commerical' to get anything
>> done. Whether or not it is 'finished' isn't what's important (in my
>> opinion), but rather the quality of the current version is what matters.
>Uhm, tell me another way to express the difference (so I could use it a
>next time). It wasn't my intention to get payed for using the compiler or
>something, just expressing the differnce between good, and 'less good'...
BTW, I'm not much of a professional , but I like the idea of getting C (my favourite language) for the lower TICalcs, so I'd like to help when I can...
Greetings,
Peter Martijn
- Warning
- Could not process part with given Content-Type:
application/ms-tnef