Re: A83: asm coded basic routine

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A83: asm coded basic routine
From: "DoomRater" <HOPPEAL@fs1.usa.k12.mi.us>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 07:57:05 -0500
In-reply-to: <38DA7D44.43F4BE25@calc.org>
Organization: Unionville-Sebewaing Schools
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

On 23 Mar 00, at 15:23, Scott Dial wrote:

The ultimate problem with it is that any ASM code that revolves 
around
BASIC variables and ROM calls is bound to be pratically as slow 
as the
basic version. Further, if you are doing divisions that require
decimals, then there is little room to optimize

Yeah, that sounds about right.  Use BASIC for number probs.  Use 
Asm for simple routines that use 8-bit or 16-bit vars.  Example: 
Racing game.
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Scott "_Wrath_" Dial
wrath@calc.org
ICQ#3608935
Member of TCPA - tcpa.calc.org
__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

Shigeru Miyamoto, Post Rapture, and Yachiyo Underwood are three people who will be remembered forever.

-The Godfather

References:

Re: A83: asm coded basic routine

From: Scott Dial <wrath@calc.org>

Prev: Re: A83: OT: Netzero No banner
Next: RE: A83: Running asm Programs...
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread