Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: A83: Shells on the 83+
From: Robin Kay <kaypictures@clara.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:02:04 +0000
References: <3894C2C3.C25FAA70@clara.net> <389528F6.8AC1B338@prism.gatech.edu> <001101bf6bb8$02e24140$1a5feda9@ucdavis.edu> <389535A0.F3F7E6F6@prism.gatech.edu>
Reply-To: assembly-83@lists.ticalc.org

As I understand it you can't run a program that big using the existing
method of relocation. You would have to use an opcode convereter like I
suggested, some of my other points simply make sense if you're going to
take this step anyway.

--Robin Kay--

Richard Harper Maddox wrote:

> im posting off of a Solaris machine at school.
>
> My ideal shell is a bare bones module that allows for program write
> back, and can run a 26k program with 1k of free space.  thats it.
>
> -harper

Follow-Ups:

Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

From: "Harper Maddox" <gte172i@prism.gatech.edu>

References:

A83: Shells on the 83+

From: Robin Kay <kaypictures@clara.net>

Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

From: Richard Harper Maddox <gte172i@prism.gatech.edu>

Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

From: "Kouri" <Kouri@ucdavis.edu>

Re: A83: Shells on the 83+

From: Richard Harper Maddox <gte172i@prism.gatech.edu>